The great paradox of food security is that only governments can ensure it, but markets must do the heavy lifting. Learning to manage this relationship has proven a challenge for most countries.
Indonesia recognised this when it steered last year’s G20 Summit in Bali to a dramatic declaration that started with a primer on food security. It is uncertain if current G20 host India, which slapped a ban on non-basmati rice exports last month, can provide similar leadership on calming an increasingly turbulent world food economy.
Rice and wheat shortages now threaten another world food crisis to rival the last one in 2007–08, with ongoing post-pandemic supply disruptions, Russia’s action against Ukraine grain shipping, regional conflicts in Africa, and the emergence of drought-inducing El Niño all playing a role.
India’s rice export ban needs to be understood in this context. Food security begins at home, and the general election scheduled for the spring of next year has politicians’ eyes focused on stabilising staple food prices.
India will still try to manage the rice export ban carefully to minimise its impact on regular customers. Exempting par-boiled rice protects Bangladesh and a few African markets. Existing contracts for physical loadings are likely to be honoured.
As host country of the current G20 calendar, and with Indonesia’s successful summit still fresh in mind, India seeks to balance domestic needs with export reliability.
As the Indian shock to the world rice market unfolds, three countries are in the spotlight.
First, the question remains whether Indonesia will receive the full 1 million tonnes of rice it contracted from India. If it does, that will calm the whole world rice market.
Second, the status of the Philippines’ rice stocks is crucial. A number of experienced technocrats in the Philippine cabinet are likely to have planned for this contingency.
Third, Vietnam’s export patterns warrant scrutiny. While its crop outlook seems good, there is always the danger that the Vietnamese government might restrict exports in response to domestic hoarding. Managing price expectations in Vietnam will be critical.
In a rice emergency, all eyes inevitably turn to China. Its rice production has suffered significantly from heat and floods. The exact level of rice stocks is a state secret, but they are by far the largest in the world. Still, they are dispersed geographically, which limits central government access and control.
Food security in China is a high priority, and with both wheat and rice prices rising, it is hard to tell what the Chinese response will be. Any effort to pre-emptively procure more imports will spook the market.
In a real rice panic, Japan might play a similar role, as it did amid global food shortages in 2007-08. Then, the mere announcement by Japan’s prime minister that Tokyo would start negotiations with the Philippines to sell some of its surplus “WTO rice” was sufficient to prick the speculative bubble.
This sent world rice prices sliding. Japanese rice stocks are smaller now than in 2007, but even an offer of half a million tonnes to the neediest buyers in the region could calm any panic buying.
Rice experts at the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) are reasonably optimistic the world can get through the projected shortages. In their World Agriculture Supply and Demand Estimates, released this month, world rice production for the 2023–24 marketing year is forecast to be 8.1 million tonnes larger than in 2022–23.
World consumption is forecast to decrease by 1 million tonnes due to fewer imports by many countries in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. There will doubtless be some localised hunger from reduced consumption, but widespread rice shortages are not in the USDA’s forecast.
The Asian outlook is surprisingly reassuring considering El Niño and India’s partial rice export ban. A projected decline in China’s rice imports in 2022–23 and a subsequent large drawdown in domestic rice stocks should help. The USDA also expects Indonesia and the Philippines to come through the global rice shortages with ample stocks.
Rice is a more valuable commodity than before the start of El Niño and the Russian attacks on Ukraine’s wheat and corn exports. Rice prices are likely to rise over the next six to 12 months, perhaps by another $US100 per metric tonne for Thai or Vietnamese rice.
The big question, though, is whether the price rise will be gradual — giving consumers time to adjust without panic — or whether there will be a rapid spike. The fact that there has been little panic since India’s announcement in July gives hope that the increase in rice prices will be gradual and contained.
Source : Financial Review
